Author
Home > Education > What is the Difference Between Research and Evaluation?

Guilherme Mazui

•4 minutes to read

What is the Difference Between Research and Evaluation?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between research and evaluation lies in their purposes, methods, and outcomes. Here are the key distinctions between the two:

  1. Purpose: Research aims to generate new knowledge, theories, or insights about a particular topic or field of study, contributing to the academic discourse. Evaluation focuses on assessing the effectiveness of a specific program, intervention, or policy, providing evidence-based solutions to practical problems and informing decision-making.
  2. Methods: Research involves a structured process of identifying research questions, designing and implementing research methods, collecting and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions based on the findings. Evaluation typically involves collecting and analyzing data to determine whether a program or intervention is achieving its objectives and draws evaluative conclusions about quality, merit, or worth.
  3. Outcomes: Research outcomes contribute to the advancement of knowledge and understanding in a particular field, often generating generalizable knowledge. Evaluation outcomes are typically reported to program stakeholders and funders, focusing on the efficiency and effectiveness of the program or intervention.

While research and evaluation may use some similar methods, such as data collection and analysis, their goals and purposes are distinct. In summary, research and evaluation are separate processes with different objectives, methods, and applications.

On this page
  • What is the Difference Between Research and Evaluation?
  • Comparative Table: Research vs Evaluation

    • Comparative Table: Research vs Evaluation

    Here is a table comparing the differences between research and evaluation:

    Aspect Research Evaluation
    Definition Systematic investigation or study to establish facts, principles, or generalizable knowledge Systematic assessment of the value, effect, or significance of something, often followed by a judgment of quality
    Purpose Expand knowledge, generate theories, explore new concepts, or provide an in-depth understanding of a topic Assess the worth, impact, or quality of a project, program, or policy to inform decisions
    Methods Various research methods, such as experiments, observations, interviews, or surveys Analytical techniques, such as cost-benefit analysis, performance assessment, or impact evaluation, to measure outcomes and compare them to set goals
    Outcomes Research findings, conclusions, and recommendations for future research Evaluation results, which can guide decision-making, improve program effectiveness, or inform future planning
    Focus Discovering new knowledge, understanding, or insights about a topic Assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, and sustainability of a project, program, or policy
    Scope Can be broad, exploratory, or in-depth, depending on the research question Typically narrower and more focused on specific goals, objectives, or outcomes
    Stakeholders Researchers, academics, and experts in the field Evaluators, program managers, funders, and other stakeholders with an interest in the project or program

    While research focuses on discovering new knowledge and understanding about a topic, evaluation assesses the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, and sustainability of a project, program, or policy to inform decision-making and improve outcomes.

    Read more:

    Guilherme Mazui

    Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.