What is the Difference Between HP TouchPad and Blackberry PlayBook?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The HP TouchPad and BlackBerry PlayBook are two tablets with distinct differences and features. Some of the key differences between the two include:

  • Operating System: The PlayBook runs on BlackBerry Tablet OS, while the TouchPad uses WebOS.
  • Cameras: The HP TouchPad has a single 1.3MP forward-facing camera, whereas the BlackBerry PlayBook features dual HD cameras.
  • Design: The HP TouchPad has been criticized for its build quality, with the casing feeling flimsy and prone to collecting bodily oils. The BlackBerry PlayBook, on the other hand, has a more solid and premium feel.
  • Performance: Both tablets were highly anticipated, but they both failed to gain significant market share or critical acclaim. The HP TouchPad was considered a poor clone of other tablets, rushed into production. The BlackBerry PlayBook also suffered from management issues and missed opportunities.
  • Display: The BlackBerry PlayBook has a slightly smaller screen size compared to the HP TouchPad.

In summary, the HP TouchPad and BlackBerry PlayBook differ in their operating systems, camera capabilities, design, and performance. While both tablets were expected to be major competitors in the market, they ultimately failed to live up to their initial hype and expectations.

Comparative Table: HP TouchPad vs Blackberry PlayBook

Here is a table comparing the differences between the HP TouchPad and the Blackberry PlayBook:

Feature HP TouchPad Blackberry PlayBook
Size 9.7 inches 7 inches
Operating System WebOS 3.0 Blackberry Tablet OS
Screen Size 9.7 inches 7 inches
Weight 1.5 pounds (680 g) 0.787 pounds (375 g)
Cameras Front-facing 1.3MP (no video recording) 5MP rear-facing, 3MP front-facing (1080p video recording)
Synchronization Pre 3 phone via Bluetooth BlackBerry phone via "Bridge" application

Both tablets faced challenges in the market, with the HP TouchPad struggling with engineering issues and the Blackberry PlayBook facing management shortcomings. Both devices also suffered from a lack of applications compared to their competitors.