What is the Difference Between Biological Control and Chemical Control?

Biological control and chemical control are two popular methods of pest control, but they differ significantly in terms of the techniques and substances used, as well as their impact on the environment and human health.

Biological Control:

• Uses living organisms to kill and control pests, such as mites, insects, etc..
• Relies on natural relationships like parasitism, predation, herbivory, and competition.
• Does not harm or pose any threat to the environment and people.
• Examples include using natural predators or parasites (macrobials) and microbials.

Chemical Control:

• Uses strong chemicals to kill, prevent, or repel pests.
• Can be toxic and pose health risks to humans and the environment.
• Can contaminate the environment and leave residues on crops.
• Can require long pre-harvest intervals to ensure chemicals have time to disperse.

In summary, biological control is an eco-friendly method that does not harm the environment and people, while chemical control uses strong chemicals that can pollute the environment and contaminate the harvest of agriculture. Biological control methods often involve natural substances and living organisms, whereas chemical control methods rely on toxic chemicals that can pose risks to human health and the environment.

Comparative Table: Biological Control vs Chemical Control

Here is a table comparing biological control and chemical control:

Biological control uses living organisms to control pests, such as predators, parasites, or pathogens. It is a more natural and environmentally friendly method that does not cause contamination or resistance in pests. Chemical control, on the other hand, relies on toxic chemicals to eliminate pests, which can lead to environmental contamination and may cause resistance in pests over time. Biological control tends to be more knowledge-intensive and requires a thorough understanding of the ecology and behavior of pests and natural enemies. Chemical control is often less expensive in the short term but may have negative impacts on the environment and beneficial organisms.