What is the Difference Between Tyler and Wheeler Model of Curriculum?

The main differences between Tyler's and Wheeler's models of curriculum are:

1. Nature: Tyler's model is linear, while Wheeler's model is cyclic.
2. Phases: Tyler's model consists of four main components: objectives, selection of learning experiences, organization of learning experiences, and evaluation. In contrast, Wheeler's model has five phases: aims, goals, and objectives; learning experiences; selection of content; organization and integration of learning experiences and content; and evaluation.
3. Content and Learning Experiences: In Tyler's model, content is not separated from learning experiences, while in Wheeler's model, content is separated from learning experiences.
4. Student-Centered Approach: Tyler's model focuses on offering freedom for students to select what they learn, while Wheeler's model emphasizes a student-centered approach, taking into account students' needs and interests.
5. Teacher Engagement: The Wheeler model requires teacher engagement where necessary, while the Tyler model provides interactive learning activities for students, giving them a chance for social interaction and emotional development.
6. Evaluation: In Wheeler's model, evaluation is done, and the results are fed back into the system, while in Tyler's model, evaluation is terminal.

Comparative Table: Tyler vs Wheeler Model of Curriculum

The Tyler and Wheeler models of curriculum are two different approaches to curriculum development. Here is a table summarizing the key differences between the two models:

The Tyler model, developed by Ralph Tyler in the 1940s, is a linear model that consists of objectives, selection of learning experiences, organization of learning experiences, and evaluation. It provides interactive learning activities for students and encourages social interaction and emotional development.

The Wheeler model, on the other hand, is a cyclic model that builds upon the Tyler model. Developed by D.K. Wheeler in 1967, it consists of five phases: aims, goals, and objectives, learning experiences, selection of content, organization and integration of learning experiences and content, and evaluation. This model emphasizes the interconnectedness of various curriculum aspects and focuses on situational analysis. However, it can be time-consuming and difficult to implement.