What is the Difference Between Thinking and Reasoning?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Thinking and reasoning are two mental processes that, while related, have distinct characteristics:

  • Thinking is a broader term that encompasses various mental processes, including both conscious and unconscious thought production. It is the highest mental process related to knowledge and can be studied through experiments on problem-solving, making inferences, and using analogies. Thinking is not always logical or conscious and does not necessarily involve the use of logic.
  • Reasoning is a mental process that specifically involves the conscious production of thought using logic. It is a subcategory of thinking and plays a key role in decision-making and problem-solving. Reasoning allows individuals to identify an action, analyze whether it is positive or negative, beneficial or detrimental, based on available facts and logic. Logic plays a significant role in reasoning, and it is always a conscious effort.

In summary, thinking is a broader term that includes various mental processes, while reasoning is a specific type of thinking that involves the use of logic and evidence to make informed decisions and draw conclusions.

Comparative Table: Thinking vs Reasoning

Thinking and reasoning are interconnected cognitive processes that contribute to problem-solving and decision-making. However, they differ in certain aspects. Here is a table highlighting the differences between thinking and reasoning:

Feature Thinking Reasoning
Definition Thinking is the mental process in which beings form psychological associations and models of the world. Reasoning is the mental process of making logically compelling justifications and arguments to support or undermine beliefs, and action.
Nature Thinking is fast, automatic, and emotional. Reasoning is slow, effortful, and logical.
Role in Problem-Solving Thinking is a shortcut strategy that we use to make judgments and solve problems. Reasoning is the process of constructing arguments to support or undermine beliefs and actions.
Accuracy Heuristics, which are mental shortcuts used in thinking, do not guarantee correct judgments and solutions. Reasoning, when done correctly, can lead to logically compelling justifications and arguments.
Examples 1. Forming mental associations between different concepts.
  1. Generating ideas based on existing knowledge.
  2. Making quick judgments using mental shortcuts. | 1. Analyzing evidence and determining its validity.
  3. Identifying biases, distortions, omissions, and assumptions in information.
  4. Constructing logical arguments to support or undermine beliefs and actions. |

In summary, thinking is a faster, more automatic process that uses mental shortcuts to make judgments and problem-solve, while reasoning is a slower, more effortful process that relies on logical arguments to support or undermine beliefs and actions.