What is the Difference Between StringBuffer and StringBuilder?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main differences between StringBuffer and StringBuilder in Java are:

  1. Thread Safety: StringBuffer is thread-safe and synchronized, meaning it ensures that only one thread can access its methods at a time. This makes it suitable for use in multi-threaded environments. On the other hand, StringBuilder is not thread-safe, as it is not synchronized, making it faster and more suitable for single-threaded environments.
  2. Performance: StringBuilder is generally faster than StringBuffer due to its unsynchronized nature, which allows it to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
  3. Use Cases: StringBuffer is better suited for scenarios where the text will change and is used by multiple threads, while StringBuilder is more suitable for situations where the text is used by a single thread and is likely to change.

In summary, StringBuffer is recommended for multi-threaded environments due to its thread safety, while StringBuilder is more appropriate for single-threaded environments because of its faster performance.

Comparative Table: StringBuffer vs StringBuilder

The main difference between StringBuilder and StringBuffer lies in their synchronization and performance characteristics. Here is a table comparing the two:

Feature StringBuffer StringBuilder
Synchronization Synchronized (thread-safe) Not synchronized
Performance Slower due to synchronization Faster due to unsynchronized nature

Both StringBuilder and StringBuffer are mutable classes, meaning their content can be changed. However, StringBuffer is synchronized, making it thread-safe and suitable for use in multi-threaded applications. On the other hand, StringBuilder is not synchronized, which results in better performance and is more suitable for general programming scenarios.