What is the Difference Between Silicone Implant and Saline Implant?

The main differences between silicone and saline implants are the feel, aesthetic look, incisions required for implantation, and rupture safety. Here is a comparison of the two types of implants:

Feel: Silicone implants are designed to feel more like natural breast tissue and are soft to the touch, while saline implants are usually firmer.
Aesthetic Look: Saline implants have a more firm and round appearance, whereas silicone implants have a more natural look and resemble breast tissue more closely in terms of shape and curvature.
Incisions Required: Silicone implants are prefilled and require larger incisions for implantation, while saline implants are empty shells filled with a sterile saltwater solution after being placed in the body, requiring smaller incisions.
Rupture Safety: In case of a rupture, the saline solution from saline implants can be safely absorbed by the body, while silicone implant ruptures may cause side effects such as swelling, soreness, and structural changes to breast tissue.

Both types of implants are considered safe and can last between 10 and 20 years. The choice between silicone and saline implants depends on factors such as the desired appearance, feel, and safety concerns. It is essential to consult with a plastic surgeon to determine the best option for your specific needs.

On this page

What is the Difference Between Silicone Implant and Saline Implant?

Comparative Table: Silicone Implant vs Saline Implant

Here is a comparison table of silicone and saline breast implants:

Feature	Silicone Implants	Saline Implants
Appearance	Offers a more natural consistency and look	Tends to have a firmer, fuller, and rounder appearance, potentially resulting in a less natural look
Fill Material	Filled with silicone gel	Filled with a saline solution (water and salt)
Safety	Generally considered safe, but requires more surveillance due to less obvious failure	Considered safer by some due to the use of a solution similar to that of tears, blood, and body fluids, but has a slightly higher rupture rate and increased likelihood of complications
Rupture Rate	Lower rupture rate	Higher rupture rate
Complications	Lower rates of complications such as capsular contracture, malposition, asymmetry, and palpability/visibility	Higher rates of complications such as capsular contracture, malposition, asymmetry, and palpability/visibility
Monitoring	Requires less monitoring due to less obvious failure	Requires more monitoring due to higher rupture rate and increased likelihood of complications

Both silicone and saline implants are safe and perform well, but they have different characteristics and potential complications. The choice between the two depends on individual preferences and priorities, such as the desired appearance, safety concerns, and ease of monitoring.

Guilherme Mazui

Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.