Author
Home > Business > What is the Difference Between Negotiation and Arbitration?

Guilherme Mazui

•4 minutes to read

What is the Difference Between Negotiation and Arbitration?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between negotiation and arbitration lies in the level of involvement of third parties and the binding nature of the outcomes. Here are the key differences:

Negotiation:

  • Involves the parties in a conflict or dispute reaching a settlement between themselves.
  • The parties communicate and discuss the issues directly, without the assistance of a third party.
  • Negotiations are generally less expensive and time-consuming than other forms of dispute resolution.
  • No third party is involved, so the parties must work together to find a solution that both can agree on.

Arbitration:

  • A neutral third party, called an arbitrator, makes a decision on the dispute after hearing both sides of the argument.
  • The arbitrator's decision is often binding, meaning both parties must abide by it.
  • Arbitration is usually quicker than settling the dispute through the court system and is generally less formal.
  • The arbitrator's expertise in the field in which the dispute is occurring can be an advantage.
  • The parties submit their arguments and evidence to the arbitrator, who then makes a decision that is binding on both parties.

In summary, negotiation involves the parties directly working on a mutual agreement, while arbitration involves a neutral third party making a binding decision after hearing both sides of the argument.

On this page
  • What is the Difference Between Negotiation and Arbitration?
  • Comparative Table: Negotiation vs Arbitration

    • Comparative Table: Negotiation vs Arbitration

    Here is a table comparing the differences between negotiation and arbitration:

    Feature Negotiation Arbitration
    Definition Direct communication between two parties to reach an agreement A neutral third party resolves the dispute after listening to both sides' arguments and evidence
    Role of Third Party Facilitator assists the parties in reaching an agreement Arbitrator makes a binding decision after listening to both sides' arguments and evidence
    Flexibility Parties can negotiate any aspect of the process Parties can negotiate some aspects of the process, but the arbitrator's decision is final
    Decision No binding decision is made; parties reach an agreement voluntarily Arbitrator's decision is binding on both parties and cannot be appealed
    Cost Can be cheaper than arbitration, but may be more challenging to bring parties together Tends to be less expensive and faster than litigation, but may be more expensive than negotiation
    Confidentiality Process and documentation are private and confidential Process and documentation are private and confidential
    Example Two employees discussing a workplace issue and reaching an agreement through their boss Two companies resolving a dispute through a neutral third-party arbitrator

    Negotiation involves direct communication between two parties to reach an agreement, while arbitration involves a neutral third party, such as an arbitrator, resolving the dispute after listening to both sides' arguments and evidence.

    Read more:

    Guilherme Mazui

    Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.