What is the Difference Between Nanopore and Illumina Sequencing?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Nanopore and Illumina sequencing are two powerful sequencing technologies that can be used to sequence DNA and RNA molecules. They offer high-throughput sequencing capabilities and are suitable for whole-genome sequencing for various organisms. However, there are significant differences between the two technologies:

  1. Sequencing method: Illumina sequencing utilizes a reversible dye terminator technique, while nanopore sequencing uses protein nanopores to detect changes in the current of a DNA or RNA molecule.
  2. Read length: Illumina sequencing produces shorter read lengths, typically up to 500 base pairs (bp), whereas nanopore sequencing excels at producing long read lengths, extending into the hundreds of kilobases range.
  3. Strengths: Illumina sequencing is known for its exceptional accuracy (read accuracy of >99.9%), high throughput, and robust infrastructure. Nanopore sequencing, on the other hand, offers the advantages of long read lengths, real-time analysis, and portability.
  4. Accuracy: Illumina sequencing is generally more accurate than nanopore sequencing. For example, Illumina sequencers have a read accuracy of >99.9%, while Oxford Nanopore sequencers have a read accuracy of around 97%.

In summary, both Illumina and nanopore sequencing technologies have their strengths and weaknesses. Researchers should consider the specific requirements of their projects, such as read length, accuracy, and sequencing method, when choosing between the two technologies. In some cases, using both Illumina and nanopore sequencing technologies in combination can provide the most comprehensive insight into genomic data.

Comparative Table: Nanopore vs Illumina Sequencing

Here is a table comparing the differences between Nanopore and Illumina sequencing:

Feature Nanopore Sequencing Illumina Sequencing
Generation Third-generation Second-generation
Read Length Long reads Short reads
Accuracy 92-97% >99.9%
Technology Nanopore Sequencing-by-synthesis
Real-time Analysis Yes No
Portability Portable devices Not as portable
Read Accuracy Lower Higher

Both Nanopore and Illumina sequencing are high-throughput sequencing methods, providing researchers with reliable data in rapid timeframes. They are suitable for whole-genome sequencing, from small to large organisms, with different sequencing read lengths depending on the technology used. However, there are some key differences between the two:

  • Generation: Nanopore sequencing is a third-generation sequencing technique, while Illumina sequencing is a second-generation technique.
  • Read Length: Nanopore sequencing generates long reads of DNA sequence, while Illumina sequencing generates short reads.
  • Accuracy: Illumina sequencers tend to have a higher read accuracy (>99.9%) compared to Nanopore sequencers (92-97%).
  • Technology: Nanopore sequencing uses nanopores to detect the sequence of DNA molecules, while Illumina sequencing uses reversible dye terminators in a sequencing-by-synthesis approach.
  • Real-time Analysis: Nanopore sequencing allows for real-time analysis, which is not possible with Illumina sequencing.
  • Portability: Nanopore sequencers are more portable than Illumina sequencers, enabling real-time analysis of data in the field.

Both sequencing methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and a better understanding of why and when each method should be used is key for unlocking the most comprehensive insight into genomic data.