What is the Difference Between Mali-400MP GPU and Tegra 2?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between the Mali-400MP GPU and the Tegra 2 lies in the fact that the Mali-400MP is a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) developed by ARM, while the Tegra 2 is a mobile CPU developed by NVIDIA that contains an integrated GPU.

  • Mali-400MP GPU: This GPU supports a wide range of applications, from mobile user interfaces to smartbooks, HDTV, and mobile gaming. It is scalable from one to four cores and provides high performance support for various graphics-related tasks.
  • Tegra 2: This is a System-on-Chip (SoC) developed by NVIDIA for mobile devices such as smartphones, personal digital assistants, and mobile Internet devices. It features a dual-core CPU and an integrated GPU, which NVIDIA claims is the first mobile dual-core CPU. Tegra 2 also contains a 1080p Video Playback Processor, allowing users to watch 1080p HD movies.

Benchmark tests performed by Anandtech show that the Mali-400MP GPU is slightly behind NVIDIA's Tegra 2 in performance. Both GPUs are part of the second generation of graphics processing units, with the Mali-400MP being older and less advanced than the Tegra 3.

Comparative Table: Mali-400MP GPU vs Tegra 2

The main difference between the Mali-400MP GPU and the Tegra 2 lies in the fact that the Mali-400MP is a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) developed by ARM, while the Tegra 2 is a mobile CPU developed by Nvidia that contains a GPU. Here is a comparison table of the key differences between the two:

Feature Mali-400MP GPU Tegra 2
Developer ARM Nvidia
Type GPU Mobile CPU with integrated GPU
Use Cases Mobile user interfaces, smartbooks, HDTV, mobile gaming Mobile devices such as smartphones, PDAs, MIDs
Programmable Architecture Yes No
Single Driver Stack Yes No
Tile-based Deferred Rendering Yes No
Local Buffering Efficient Alpha Blending Yes No
Full Scene Anti-Aliasing (FSAA) Yes No
1080p Video Playback Processor No Yes

Mali-400MP GPU supports a wide range of use cases, from mobile user interfaces to smartbooks, HDTV, and mobile gaming. It has a programmable architecture, a single driver stack for all multi-core configurations, and features like tile-based deferred rendering, local buffering efficient alpha blending of multiple layers in hardware, and Full Scene Anti-Aliasing (FSAA).

On the other hand, Tegra 2 is a System-on-Chip (SoC) developed for mobile devices and contains a GPU as part of the package. It also includes a 1080p Video Playback Processor, allowing users to watch 1080p HD movies stored on their devices. However, Tegra 2 does not support the programmable architecture, single driver stack, or the advanced features like Mali-400MP.