What is the Difference Between Link State and Distance Vector?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between link-state and distance-vector routing protocols lies in the way they gather and share information about the network topology. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Information Gathering: Distance-vector protocols only need to know the state of their neighbors and the metrics for each path to a particular subnet. In contrast, link-state protocols require a complete picture of the network topology, as each router shares information about its directly connected links with all other routers in the network.
  2. Data Sharing: Distance-vector protocols send their entire routing table to directly connected neighbors. On the other hand, link-state protocols flood the entire network with information about their directly connected links.
  3. Algorithms: Distance-vector protocols make use of the Bellman-Ford Algorithm for making routing tables, while link-state protocols use Dijkstra's algorithm.
  4. Bandwidth Requirements: Distance-vector routing requires less bandwidth due to local sharing, small packets, and no flooding. In contrast, link-state routing requires more bandwidth due to flooding and sending large link-state packets.
  5. Router Utilization: Link-state protocols have higher router utilization as they need to keep information about the entire network. Distance-vector protocols have lower router utilization as they only need to know about their directly connected neighbors.
  6. Network Convergence: Link-state protocols have faster convergence times as they have a complete picture of the network topology. Distance-vector protocols have slower convergence times as they rely on the exchange of information between neighbors.
  7. Best Path Accuracy: Link-state protocols can deterministically compute the shortest path to any given destination using the Dijkstra algorithm. Distance-vector protocols base their decisions on the best path to a given destination based on local knowledge, which may not always result in the optimal path.

In conclusion, the choice between link-state and distance-vector routing protocols depends on the specific requirements of a network, such as network size, topology, and desired performance characteristics.

Comparative Table: Link State vs Distance Vector

Link State and Distance Vector are two different approaches to dynamic routing algorithms in computer networks. Here is a comparison table highlighting the key differences between them:

Feature Link State Routing Distance Vector Routing
Bandwidth requirement More due to flooding and sending large link state packets Less due to local sharing, small packets, and no flooding
Knowledge base Global knowledge about the entire network Local knowledge based on information from neighbors
Algorithm Dijkstra's algorithm Bellman-Ford algorithm
Update frequency Information sharing takes place only when there is a change Information is shared with neighbors at regular intervals
Examples OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and IS-IS (Intermediate System to Intermediate System) RIP (Routing Information Protocol) and IGRP (Interior Gateway Routing Protocol)

In summary, Link State Routing protocols have a broader perspective of the network, using a global view of the routers, while Distance Vector protocols work with the state of the neighbors' routers, using a more local view of the network.