What is the Difference Between Legal and Equitable Remedies?

The main difference between legal and equitable remedies lies in their nature and the circumstances under which they are awarded. Here is a comparative overview of the two types of remedies:

Legal Remedies:

Legal remedies are awarded in cases where a party has breached their legal rights, and the non-breaching party seeks to recover monetary damages.
These remedies are typically awarded based on a set of rules and guidelines, making the outcome more predictable.
Examples of legal remedies include compensation for damages sustained as a result of a contract breach and reimbursement for various items like out-of-pocket expenses.

Equitable Remedies:

Equitable remedies are available when a party has suffered some sort of injustice or unfairness, and they seek a non-monetary solution to resolve the disputed issue.
These remedies are granted at the discretion of the court, which has more flexibility in determining what type of remedy is appropriate.
Examples of equitable remedies include specific performance (a court order requiring a party to fulfill their obligations under a contract) and injunction (a court order that requires a party to do or refrain from doing something).

In summary, legal remedies involve monetary compensation and are typically awarded based on established rules, while equitable remedies involve non-monetary solutions and are granted at the discretion of the court. In some cases, a party may seek both legal and equitable remedies in the same lawsuit, depending on the specific circumstances of the case.