What is the Difference Between Incremental and Zero-based Budgeting?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between incremental and zero-based budgeting lies in how they are prepared and the level of scrutiny they require. Here are the key differences:
Incremental Budgeting:
- Incremental budgeting uses previous budgets and actual performance as a baseline from which to build forward-looking budgets.
- It is a traditional method that takes the current period's budget or actual performance as a base and makes adjustments for inflation, growth, or other factors.
- This approach is simple, easy, and consistent, as it allows you to maintain the status quo and avoid drastic changes.
- However, it can also be inefficient, rigid, and outdated, as it does not account for changing needs, opportunities, or threats.
Zero-based Budgeting:
- Zero-based budgeting starts from a base of zero, with no reference made to the prior period's budget or actual performance.
- Each expense needs to be justified before it will be added to the official budget, forcing decision-makers to scrutinize their assumptions and prioritize specific activities.
- This method can help eliminate waste, optimize resource allocation, and respond to changes in the business environment.
- However, it can be very time-consuming and costly due to the need to adopt a detailed approach and justify every expense and revenue item based on its relevance and value for the current period.
In summary, incremental budgeting is a more straightforward and consistent method that relies on historical data, while zero-based budgeting is a more detailed and critical approach that starts from scratch and requires justification for every expense and revenue item. The choice between these two methods depends on the organization's needs, goals, and resources.
Comparative Table: Incremental vs Zero-based Budgeting
Here is a table comparing the differences between incremental and zero-based budgeting:
| Feature | Incremental Budgeting | Zero-Based Budgeting |
|---|---|---|
| Base for Budgeting | Uses previous budgets and actual performance as a baseline | Starts from zero, without reference to prior periods |
| Preparation | Less time-consuming, as it involves making changes to the previous year's budget | More time-consuming, as it requires justification for all resources and deep analysis |
| Transparency | Less transparent, as it assumes past activity and spend will be repeated | Highly transparent, as it requires justification for each expense |
| Employee Motivation | May not encourage a bottom-up approach or questioning attitude among managers | Encourages a bottom-up approach and challenges the status quo |
| Ranking of Activities | Does not necessarily rank activities based on their importance and need for resources | Ranks activities based on their importance and allocates resources accordingly |
Incremental budgeting is a less time-consuming method that uses previous budgets and actual performance as a baseline for the current period's budget. It may lead to unnecessary spending and is less transparent than zero-based budgeting. On the other hand, zero-based budgeting starts from zero and requires justification for all resources, making it more time-consuming and transparent. It encourages a bottom-up approach, challenges the status quo, and ranks activities based on their importance.
- Zero Based Budgeting vs Performance Budgeting
- Flexible Budget vs Fixed Budget
- Costing vs Budgeting
- Budgeting vs Forecasting
- Capital Budget vs Revenue Budget
- Master Budget vs Flexible Budget
- Master Budget vs Cash Budget
- Budget vs Budgetary Control
- Standard Costing vs Budgetary Control
- Cash Budget vs Projected Income Statement
- Budget Deficit vs Fiscal Deficit
- Variable vs Fixed Costs
- Budget Surplus vs Budget Deficit
- Zero vs Null
- Discretionary vs Committed Fixed Costs
- Activity Based Costing vs Traditional Costing
- Marginal Costing vs Differential Costing
- Strategic vs Financial Planning
- Zero vs Nothing