What is the Difference Between In-Switch Routing and Centralized Routing?

In-Switch Routing and Centralized Routing are two routing methods used in network platforms in the telecommunication industry. Here are the main differences between them:

Service Provisioning: In Centralized Routing, service provisioning is centralized, whereas in In-Switch Routing, it is distributed.
Database Method: Centralized Routing uses a vendor-independent database method with a common interface for all switches. In contrast, In-Switch Routing has a distributed database, and each switch may have its own limitations that need to be managed.
Real-time Traffic Management System and Routing Decision Making System: In Centralized Routing, these systems can feed the Least Cost Routing (LCR) or Best routes to the centralized database with a single interface. In In-Switch Routing, LCR or routing decisions need to be loaded onto each switch via different interfaces and formats, depending on the switch's limitations.
Database Availability: In Centralized Routing, the database availability is more important since the whole network relies on a single point. Failures can affect the entire network. In In-Switch Routing, the database is independent of the network, and in case of failures, only the affected switch is impacted.
Redundancy: In Centralized Routing, the master database can be replicated across multiple boxes as required and kept in active sync with the master. In In-Switch Routing, there is no built-in redundancy.

In summary, Centralized Routing relies on a single, centralized database for routing decisions, while In-Switch Routing distributes the routing decisions to each switch. This results in key differences in service provisioning, database management, and redundancy.

On this page

What is the Difference Between In-Switch Routing and Centralized Routing?

Comparative Table: In-Switch Routing vs Centralized Routing

In-switch routing and centralized routing are two different methods used in network platforms within the telecommunication industry. Here is a table comparing the differences between the two:

Feature	In-Switch Routing	Centralized Routing
Routing Database	Each switch maintains its own routing database, which can lead to duplication and increased manpower requirements.	The routing database is kept in a central place, and each switching element communicates with the centralized routing database.
Communication Protocols	Switching elements may use various protocols, such as AIN, INAP, MAP, ENUM, SIP, and WIN, to communicate with the centralized routing database.	Switching elements use the same protocols to communicate with the centralized routing database.
Database Availability	The availability of the database is more important in centralized routing, as the entire network relies on a single point.	Database availability is less critical in in-switch routing, as the database is independent of the network and failures affect only the specific switch.
Technical Expertise	Technical expertise or vendor experience is not required to load data in centralized routing.	Technical expertise or vendor experience may be required to load data in in-switch routing.
Service Provisioning	Service provisioning is centralized in centralized routing.	Service provisioning is not centralized in in-switch routing.
Database Limitations	In in-switch routing, switches may have database limitations that need to be managed.	There are no database limitations in centralized routing, as the database is managed centrally.
Real-time Traffic Management	Real-time traffic management can be more challenging in in-switch routing due to the distributed nature of the routing databases.	Real-time traffic management is more straightforward in centralized routing, as all switching elements communicate with a single, centralized routing database.

In summary, centralized routing offers better scalability, manageability, and real-time traffic management compared to in-switch routing. However, the choice between the two methods depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the network.

Guilherme Mazui

Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.