What is the Difference Between Group Polarization and Groupthink?

Group polarization and groupthink are two distinct phenomena that occur in group decision-making processes. Here are the key differences between the two:

Group Polarization:

Refers to the tendency for group decision-making to result in more extreme positions than the initial inclinations of its members.
Occurs when people with similar ideas discuss and, after everyone talks, they all have stronger views than before.
Tends to result in either extremely conservative decisions (if group members are cautious) or risky decisions (if group members are risk-averse).

Groupthink:

Refers to a process whereby a group reaches a consensus without evaluating or critically analyzing alternative solutions.
Occurs when individuals make decisions with the goal of not upsetting the majority opinion.
Individuals suppress their own ideas in favor of conforming to those of the group, which can lead to dysfunctional or irrational decision-making.

In summary, group polarization is characterized by the adoption of more extreme positions in group decision-making, while groupthink is characterized by the suppression of individual opinions in favor of conforming to the group's consensus. Both phenomena can have significant impacts on decision-making and group dynamics, and can lead to unhealthy outcomes in certain situations.

On this page

What is the Difference Between Group Polarization and Groupthink?

Comparative Table: Group Polarization vs Groupthink

Here is a table comparing Group Polarization and Groupthink:

Characteristic	Group Polarization	Groupthink
Definition	Group Polarization refers to a decision-making tactic that focuses on decision making in groups, resulting in decisions that are more extreme than the original opinions of group members.	Groupthink refers to a process whereby a group reaches a consensus without evaluating or critically assessing alternative solutions or viewpoints, often resulting in irrational or dysfunctional decisions.
Decision-Making	Decisions tend to be more extreme and conservative, as the group focuses on reaching collective choices that are less moderate than the original opinions of group members.	Decisions are made based on the desire of not upsetting a group of people, often leading to conformity and the avoidance of critical evaluation.
Group Members' Roles	Individuals in the group may feel strongly about their opinions and push for a more extreme outcome, but they are still influenced by the group's collective decision-making process.	Individuals in the group may sacrifice their own ideas and opinions in favor of conforming to the majority, often influenced by a leader or authority figure.
Risk-Taking	Group polarization can result in risk-averse individuals making high-risk decisions.	Groupthink can lead to risk-averse individuals making high-risk decisions, as they ignore warnings and dissenting opinions in favor of the majority consensus.
Example	A group of people discussing the spiciness of a curry may collectively decide to make it spicier than their individual preferences.	A group of engineers might ignore warnings about a faulty space shuttle design due to the consensus to launch at all costs, leading to the Challenger disaster.

In summary, Group Polarization involves groups making decisions that are more extreme than their individual opinions, while Groupthink occurs when a group's desire for conformity leads to irrational and dysfunctional decision-making.

Guilherme Mazui

Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.