Author
Home > Science > What is the Difference Between Fluorescence Microscopy and Confocal Microscopy?

Guilherme Mazui

•4 minutes to read

What is the Difference Between Fluorescence Microscopy and Confocal Microscopy?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Fluorescence microscopy and confocal microscopy are both techniques used to study biological samples, but they have some key differences:

  1. Illumination: In fluorescence microscopy, the entire specimen is flooded evenly with light from a light source, while in confocal microscopy, only some points of the specimen are exposed to light from a light source.
  2. Out-of-focus light: Fluorescence microscopy stimulates dye molecules in the field of view, including those in out-of-focus planes, which can contribute blur to the images. Confocal microscopy provides a means of rejecting the out-of-focus light from the detector, such that it does not contribute blur to the images being collected.
  3. Depth of field: Confocal microscopy offers the ability to control depth of field, elimination or reduction of background information away from the focal plane, and the capability to collect serial optical sections from thick specimens.
  4. Optical resolution: Confocal microscopy provides only a marginal improvement in both axial (z; along the optical axis) and lateral (x and y; in the specimen plane) optical resolution compared to conventional widefield fluorescence microscopy.

In summary, confocal microscopy is a more advanced form of fluorescence microscopy that offers better control over depth of field, improved image quality by reducing out-of-focus light, and the ability to collect serial optical sections from thick specimens. However, it provides only a marginal improvement in optical resolution compared to conventional widefield fluorescence microscopy.

On this page
  • What is the Difference Between Fluorescence Microscopy and Confocal Microscopy?
  • Comparative Table: Fluorescence Microscopy vs Confocal Microscopy

    • Comparative Table: Fluorescence Microscopy vs Confocal Microscopy

    Here is a table comparing fluorescence microscopy and confocal microscopy:

    Feature Fluorescence Microscopy Confocal Microscopy
    Light Source Widefield illumination with xenon arc lamps, mercury-vapor lamps, LEDs, or lasers Point illumination source or focused laser beam
    Illumination Entire specimen is flooded evenly with light from the light source Only some points of the specimen are exposed to light from the source
    Detection System Emission filter, dichroic mirror, and detector (e.g., CCD camera) Detector passes emitted light through a pinhole
    Lateral Resolution Lower lateral resolution compared to confocal microscopy Improved lateral resolution compared to fluorescence microscopy
    Axial Resolution Worse axial resolution compared to confocal microscopy Better axial resolution compared to fluorescence microscopy
    Out-of-Focus Light Rejection Do not reject out-of-focus light, which can cause blur and reduce resolution Rejects out-of-focus light, which reduces blur and improves resolution
    Sample Preparation Can be used with plastic dishes and dip-in objectives Demands better sample preparation due to the high resolution requirements
    Time and Expense Less expensive and faster technique compared to confocal microscopy More expensive and time-consuming than fluorescence microscopy
    Read more:

    Guilherme Mazui

    Guilherme Mazui is graduated in journalism from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) and a master's degree in Communication from the University of São Paulo (USP). In addition, he has experience in advertising writing and has worked as a content editor in several companies.