What is the Difference Between Diversity and Affirmative Action?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Diversity and affirmative action are both approaches aimed at addressing discrimination and promoting inclusion in the workplace, but they differ in their focus and implementation.

Diversity refers to the range of human qualities that are different from our own and those of groups to which we belong, but are manifested in other individuals and groups. Dimensions of diversity include, but are not limited to, age, ethnicity, gender, physical abilities, race, sexual orientation, educational background, geographic location, income, marital or partner status, military experience, parental status, religious beliefs, work experience, and job classification.

Diversity initiatives are goals devised to measure acceptance of minorities by embracing cultural differences. They focus on changing the organization's culture to be more accepting of varying views, values, and differences. Diversity is voluntary and takes a broader approach, including not only those previously addressed by affirmative action but also other groups of individuals regardless of their beliefs, religions, perspectives, values, political views, sexual orientation, etc.

Affirmative action is numbers-oriented and aims at changing the demographics within an organization. It is focused on improving the number of diverse employees hired and is a legal requirement for federal contractors above certain dollar limits. Affirmative action plans (AAPs) define an employer's standard for proactively recruiting, hiring, and promoting women, minorities, disabled individuals, and veterans. They include numerical measures with the intent of increasing the representation of minorities.

In summary, the main differences between diversity and affirmative action are:

  • Focus: Diversity is aimed at changing the organizational culture and developing skills and policies that get the best from everyone, while affirmative action is focused on improving the number of diverse employees hired.
  • Approach: Diversity is voluntary and takes a broader approach, including a wide range of individuals regardless of their beliefs, religions, perspectives, values, political views, sexual orientation, etc. Affirmative action is mandatory for federal contractors and focuses on specific groups of individuals.
  • Implementation: Diversity initiatives are goals devised to measure acceptance of minorities by embracing cultural differences, while affirmative action plans include numerical measures with the intent of increasing the representation of minorities.

Affirmative action and diversity go hand-in-hand, each reinforcing the gains of the other.

Comparative Table: Diversity vs Affirmative Action

Diversity and affirmative action are related concepts, but they have distinct approaches and objectives. Here is a table summarizing the differences between them:

Diversity Affirmative Action
Focuses on creating an inclusive environment where everyone has equal access to opportunities Aims to rectify past and present injustices by providing preferential treatment, often through quotas or preferences in hiring, college admissions, and contracting
Voluntary efforts taken by organizations Frequently mandated or regulated
Addresses a wide range of differences, including race, workplace styles, disabilities, and other factors Primarily focuses on race, gender representation, people with disabilities, and covered veterans
Managing diversity is behavioral, aimed at changing the organizational culture, and developing skills and policies that get the best from everyone Numbers-oriented, aimed at changing the demographics within the organization
Builds on the critical foundation laid by workplace equity programs Often leads to heated debates and controversy

In summary, diversity management focuses on creating an inclusive organizational culture that values and leverages the unique perspectives and experiences of all employees, while affirmative action is a policy aimed at increasing opportunities for underrepresented groups to remedy historical injustices. Both approaches share a common goal of promoting fairness and reducing discrimination, but they differ in their methods and objectives.