What is the Difference Between Cultural Relativism and Moral Relativism?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between cultural relativism and moral relativism lies in the scope of their application and the nature of the values they consider relative.

Cultural Relativism:

  • Cultural relativism is a methodological tool used in anthropology and other social sciences to understand and interpret cultural practices and phenomena.
  • It emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural practices within their specific context, without making value judgments.
  • Cultural relativism does not imply moral relativism, as it is possible to understand and empathize with cultural practices while still finding them immoral.

Moral Relativism:

  • Moral relativism is a philosophical position that asserts there can be no universal standards of justice and morality because every culture has its own unique moral values and principles.
  • It is often contrasted with moral absolutism, which argues that certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong.
  • Moral relativism holds that moral standards are culturally defined, making it difficult to determine what is truly right or wrong.

In summary, cultural relativism is a tool for understanding and interpreting cultural practices without making judgments, while moral relativism is a philosophical position that denies the existence of universal moral standards. These two concepts are distinct, and one can be a cultural relativist without being a moral relativist.

Comparative Table: Cultural Relativism vs Moral Relativism

Here is a table highlighting the differences between cultural relativism and moral relativism:

Aspect Cultural Relativism Moral Relativism
Definition Cultural relativism refers to not judging a culture by our own standards of what is right or wrong, strange or normal, and understanding cultural practices in their own cultural context. Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (e.g., that of a culture or a historical period), and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others.
Focus Cultural relativism focuses on understanding and respecting the cultural practices and beliefs of other groups without imposing one's own judgments or values. Moral relativism focuses on the idea that moral values and principles are relative to the individual, culture, or society, and that there are no universally valid moral principles.
Objectivity Cultural relativism does not claim that all moralities are on the same plane or that there are no universal moral values. It simply emphasizes understanding and respecting cultural differences without making judgments. Moral relativism asserts that all moralities are on the same plane, and there are no universal moral values shared by every human society.
Applications Cultural relativism can be applied to various aspects of culture, such as customs, traditions, and social norms. Moral relativism is specifically focused on moral judgments and principles.
Challenges Cultural relativism can be challenging when confronted with cultural practices that conflict with universal rights or natural rights. Moral relativism can lead to the rejection of any universally valid moral principles, which may be seen as a form of moral nihilism.

In summary, while both cultural and moral relativism acknowledge the diversity of human beliefs and practices, they differ in their focus and implications. Cultural relativism emphasizes understanding and respecting cultural differences without making judgments, whereas moral relativism asserts that moral values and principles are relative to the individual, culture, or society, and that there are no universally valid moral principles.