What is the Difference Between Conventional Testing and Object Oriented Testing?

The main difference between conventional testing and object-oriented testing lies in their approach and focus. Here are the key differences between the two testing methods:

Conventional Testing:

• Conventional testing is a software testing process conducted when the waterfall life cycle is used while developing software.
• It focuses on decomposition and functional approaches.
• The three levels of testing (system, integration, unit) are used in conventional testing.
• Conventional testing is often time-consuming and expensive, and may not detect all types of software defects or issues.

Object-Oriented Testing:

• Object-oriented testing is a software testing process that is conducted to test the software using encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, etc..
• It is based on the hierarchy of classes and well-defined objects.
• Object-oriented testing typically undergoes many levels of testing, from unit testing to system or acceptance testing.
• Unit testing in object-oriented testing focuses on testing individual objects or classes in isolation, while integration testing verifies that different objects or classes can work together.

In summary, conventional testing follows a more traditional approach, focusing on decomposition and functional approaches, while object-oriented testing is based on the hierarchy of classes and objects, and emphasizes testing individual objects or classes in isolation.

Comparative Table: Conventional Testing vs Object Oriented Testing

Here is a table that highlights the main differences between conventional testing and object-oriented testing:

In summary, conventional testing focuses on decomposition and functional approaches, with larger units and a sequential approach. On the other hand, object-oriented testing emphasizes composition and object-based approaches, with smaller units and an incremental approach.