What is the Difference Between Cathodoluminescence and Photoluminescence?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Cathodoluminescence (CL) and Photoluminescence (PL) are both types of luminescence, which is the emission of light from a material after being excited by an external source. The main difference between the two lies in the type of excitation used:

  • Cathodoluminescence: This process involves the emission of light as a result of excitation by electrons. The electron beam is typically produced in an electron microscope (SEM, TEM, or microprobe EPMA) or in a Cathodoluminescence microscopy coupled with an electron gun (OM-CL). The selection rules for CL emission are different from those for PL due to the high energy and momentum of electrons, allowing inspection from the deep UV to the IR.
  • Photoluminescence: In contrast, PL is the process of light emission as a result of excitation by photons. Light sources, often lasers, used for PL excitation have a narrow energy range, probing specific transitions. PL is a form of luminescence that occurs with photoexcitation via photon absorption.

Some key differences between cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence include:

  • Excitation Source: CL involves the use of electrons for excitation, while PL uses photons.
  • Spectral Range: CL can probe a broader spectral range due to the high energy of electrons, while PL is limited to specific transitions.
  • Excitation Efficiency: The CL excitation process can be more efficient than that of PL, allowing coupling to different intermediate states in the material, such as defect states.
  • Material Properties Investigation: Cathodoluminescence can be imaged separately from other types of emissions, including photoluminescence, and is used for advanced investigation of material properties.

In summary, the main difference between cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence is the type of excitation used, with electrons used in CL and photons used in PL. This difference leads to variations in the spectral range, excitation efficiency, and material properties investigation capabilities of the two techniques.

Comparative Table: Cathodoluminescence vs Photoluminescence

The main difference between cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence lies in the method of excitation for the light emission from a material. Here is a comparison of the two processes:

Feature Cathodoluminescence (CL) Photoluminescence (PL)
Excitation Source Electrons Photons (Light)
Emission Process Light emission resulting from electrons impacting a material Light emission resulting from photon absorption
Selection Rules Different selection rules due to the interaction of electrons with the material Selection rules governed by the specific photon energy and material properties
Excitation Energy Broadband excitation, allowing inspection from deep UV to IR Narrow energy range excitation, typically using lasers
Multiple Excitation Paths Available due to the high energy of electrons and coupling to different intermediate states, such as defect states Not available, as there is a single excitation path through photon absorption
Spatial Resolution High spatial resolution Lower spatial resolution
Depth-Resolved Information Can obtain depth-resolved information by varying electron-beam Cannot obtain depth-resolved information

In summary, cathodoluminescence involves the emission of light from a material as a result of excitation by electrons, while photoluminescence occurs due to excitation by photons. The excitation sources, processes, and spatial resolutions of these two types of emissions are different.