What is the Difference Between Aminocaproic Acid and Tranexamic Acid?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

Aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are both antifibrinolytic agents that belong to the lysine analog class. They have similar mechanisms of action, but there are some differences between them:

  1. Affinity for plasminogen: Tranexamic acid (TXA) demonstrates a 6- to 10-fold increased affinity in binding plasminogen compared with aminocaproic acid (EACA).
  2. Blood loss and transfusion rates: Studies have shown that both TXA and EACA can reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in various surgical procedures, such as total joint arthroplasty and cardiac surgery. However, some studies suggest that TXA may result in slightly fewer transfusions compared to EACA.
  3. Safety: Both TXA and EACA have been found to be safe and effective in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements, with no significant difference in postoperative blood loss, perioperative transfusions, or re-operation for bleeding.
  4. Route of administration: In some studies, TXA was administered intravenously, while EACA was applied topically. This difference in administration may have an impact on the effectiveness of the drugs.
  5. Dosage: The dosages used for TXA and EACA can vary across different studies, which may contribute to the differences in their effectiveness.

In summary, aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are both effective antifibrinolytic agents, but they differ in their affinity for plasminogen, blood loss and transfusion rates, and route of administration. While both drugs are generally safe and effective, more research is needed to determine the optimal dosage and administration method for each drug in various surgical settings.

Comparative Table: Aminocaproic Acid vs Tranexamic Acid

Aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are both antifibrinolytic agents that belong to the lysine analog class. They are used to reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in various surgical procedures, including total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Here is a table comparing the differences between these two agents:

Characteristic Aminocaproic Acid (EACA) Tranexamic Acid (TXA)
Mechanism of Action Both EACA and TXA are antifibrinolytics that inhibit fibrinolysis by binding to plasminogen. Both EACA and TXA are antifibrinolytics that inhibit fibrinolysis by binding to plasminogen.
Affinity for Plasminogen EACA has a lower affinity for plasminogen compared to TXA. TXA has a 6- to 10-fold increased affinity in binding plasminogen compared to EACA.
Uses EACA has been widely used in cardiac procedures. TXA has mostly replaced EACA as the predominant lysine analog used for major orthopedic procedures.
Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates A study comparing EACA and TXA in TKA found that both arms had zero transfusions, but blood loss in the TXA group was significantly lower than EACA at 144.2 mL (P = 0.031). A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TXA and EACA in blood management after total knee and total hip arthroplasty found differences in blood loss and transfusion rates, but the clinical significance of these differences is unclear.

In summary, both aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid are antifibrinolytic agents that help reduce blood loss and transfusion rates in various surgical procedures. Tranexamic acid has a higher affinity for plasminogen compared to aminocaproic acid, and it has mostly replaced EACA as the predominant lysine analog used for major orthopedic procedures. While there are differences in blood loss and transfusion rates between the two agents, the clinical significance of these differences is unclear.