What is the Difference Between Adiabatic and Isoperibol Calorimeter?

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚

The main difference between adiabatic and isoperibol calorimeters lies in the temperature control of their environments. Here are the key differences between the two types of calorimeters:

  • Adiabatic Calorimeter: In an adiabatic calorimeter, the environment is controlled so that no energy is lost or gained. The calorimeter vessel (bomb vessel) and bucket are surrounded by a water jacket, which is strictly heated and cooled to maintain the same temperature as the inner bucket. The temperature in the jacket (Tov) is kept the same as the temperature inside the vessel (Tiv) throughout the test, achieving a reasonably "perfect insulation". No correction calculations are required for adiabatic calorimeters.
  • Isoperibol Calorimeter: In an isoperibol calorimeter, the temperature in the jacket (Tov) is kept constant throughout the test. The surrounding water jacket is controlled to be at a constant temperature. A correction factor (Regnault-Pfaundler = ξ) that takes the heat flow into account is calculated after the test. Isoperibol calorimeters are also known as isothermal calorimeters.

In summary, adiabatic calorimeters maintain a constant temperature in both the jacket and the vessel, while isoperibol calorimeters keep the jacket temperature constant. Both types of calorimeters are used for various applications, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the experiment or measurement.

Comparative Table: Adiabatic vs Isoperibol Calorimeter

The main difference between adiabatic and isoperibol calorimeters lies in their boundary conditions and the mode of operation. Here is a table comparing the two types of calorimeters:

Feature Adiabatic Calorimeter Isoperibol Calorimeter
Purpose Measurements regarding runaway reactions Measurements for routine and occasional use
Boundary Conditions Adiabatic environment, no heat exchange with the surroundings Controlled temperature jacket, heat exchange with the surroundings
Mode of Operation Jacket temperature remains constant during the measurement Jacket temperature changes during the measurement
Correction Factor Required to compensate for heat loss to the container Not required, as heat exchange occurs with the surroundings
Sensitivity Designed for high sensitivity to measure heat capacity of small samples May be less sensitive than adiabatic calorimeters due to heat exchange with the surroundings

In summary, adiabatic calorimeters are used for measuring runaway reactions and require a correction factor for heat loss, while isoperibol calorimeters are used for routine and occasional measurements and involve heat exchange with the surroundings.